Sujet : Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily
De : gazelle (at) *nospam* shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Groupes : comp.unix.programmerDate : 07. Jan 2025, 18:16:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : The official candy of the new Millennium
Message-ID : <vljnhd$2mih3$1@news.xmission.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <
vljjmf$g76$2@reader2.panix.com>,
Dan Cross <
cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net> wrote:
...
"For play" implies things that could be, or are, open source.
So post a link to code, then.
>
Bluntly, I don't believe that any of this is true. Your posts
here show a distinct lack of relevant experience and knowledge.
Or dementia. Lot of that going around in the world today.
Many Usenet posters fall into this category. They may have been
smart/accomplished once upon a time, but that was years/decades ago, and
now they're just living on memories.
Seriously, I've seen a lot of this over the years, and we should cut this
guy some slack.
-- After 4 years of disastrous screwups, Trump now favors 3 policies that I support: 1) $2K/pp stimulus money. Who doesn't want more money? 2) Water pressure. My shower doesn't work very well; I want Donnie to come fix it. 3) Repeal of Section 230. This will lead to the demise of Face/Twit/Gram. Yey!