Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily

In article <vljnhd$2mih3$1@news.xmission.com>,
Kenny McCormack <gazelle@shell.xmission.com> wrote:

In article <vljjmf$g76$2@reader2.panix.com>,
Dan Cross <cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net> wrote:
...

"For play" implies things that could be, or are, open source.
So post a link to code, then.
>
Bluntly, I don't believe that any of this is true.  Your posts
here show a distinct lack of relevant experience and knowledge.

>
Or dementia.  Lot of that going around in the world today.
>
Many Usenet posters fall into this category.  They may have been
smart/accomplished once upon a time, but that was years/decades ago, and
now they're just living on memories.
>
Seriously, I've seen a lot of this over the years, and we should cut this
guy some slack.

A lot of USENET folks talk the talk without ever having walked
the walk, but you could be right.

- Dan C.