Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily

On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 17:23:01 -0000 (UTC)
cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) wibbled:

In article <vljmlt$29vt3$1@dont-email.me>,  <Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org> wrote:

On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 16:10:55 -0000 (UTC)
cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) wibbled:
Nope, I like my relative anonymity here and I don't need to prove anything to
some twat with a chip on his shoulder getting worked up over technical trivia.

>
>
Ok.  So we're just supposed to take your word for it, I guess.
Got it.

In one.

Believe what you like, I couldn't give a rats arse.

>
You also have no evidence to back up your claims, it seems.

Plenty of evidence out there.

Am I supposed to be impressed?

>
*shrug*  I think my credentials speak for themselves.  I really
don't care whether you're impressed or not.

What credentials? You work for some neverheardofit software house and have
mostly done a load of forks of other peoples code. Standard dev stuff, nothing
special.