Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily

On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 13:00:01 -0000 (UTC)
cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) wibbled:

In article <vllcgq$2mphu$1@dont-email.me>,  <Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org> wrote:

On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 17:19:56 -0000 (UTC)
Presuably a genius like you would know most terminal programs have a seperate
thread or a multiplex timeout in order to flash the cursor. You work out
the rest.

>
Right, handwave away those very real concerns.  We're talking
about Unix here, not code running on some microcontroller; code

Oops, awkward fact avoided eh? :)

And you don't think microcontrollers can run linux with X on top?

No, I stated the majority approach to using signals. You disagree which is
fine, but don't pretent your view is THE view, it isn't.

>
Bluntly, I don't see any evidence that you are qualified enough
to make any statement regarding the "majority approach" to,

I don't need to prove myself to argue with some random troll on a newsgroup.
If you can't handle that thats your problem, not mine.

Ego size on usenet is almost always correlated with the verbiage of a reply.

>
I'm not the one who started with dishing out insults at the
first person who disagreed with me.

Define insult. However here's one: you're clearly a thin skinned snowflake.

Feel free to have the last word, but absent some actually
technical point, I'm done with you.

Suits me mate.