Re: OT: Windows (Was: Re: Open Source does not mean easily

On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 20:27:41 -0000 (UTC)
Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> wibbled:

On 2025-01-15, Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org <Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org> wrote:

On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 20:27:54 -0000 (UTC)
Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> wibbled:

On 2025-01-08, Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org <Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org> wrote:

I don't need to prove myself to argue with some random troll on a

newsgroup.

If you can't handle that thats your problem, not mine.

>
I have to say, that's pretty tone deaf, as a reply to Dan Cross.

>
Sorry if I don't hero worship like you. If I think someone's talking bollocks

>

then I'll call it out.

>
Glad you understand the concept.
>
Dan Cross being a random troll in a newsgroup is an example of bollocks,
and it's being called out.

I've rarely seen him post here but keep holding a candle for his magnificence
if it makes you feel better.

Even if Dan happened to be caught talking bollocks, it still wouldn't
make him a troll, or random. It's simply not factual or rational.

If someone talks a load of rubbish in reply to someone and also accuses that
someone of being clueless instead of actually arguing the point then I'd say
that was trolling.

Incidentaly no one has said what this wunderkind has actually done that
deserves such praise. Given that he looks late 20s in his picture he's
certaiunly no greybeard with a long history of contributions.