Sujet : Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?
De : news.5.maazl (at) *nospam* spamgourmet.org (Marcel Mueller)
Groupes : comp.unix.programmerDate : 19. Jan 2025, 22:19:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : MB-NET.NET for Open-News-Network e.V.
Message-ID : <vmjq8b$2clu1$1@gwaiyur.mb-net.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 19.01.25 um 18:12 schrieb Kenny McCormack:
What you are calling "sense #2" (i.e., the "glibc wrapper" that is provided
for most (not all) syscalls) is just another function and can, of course,
be interposed.
Not necessarily.
The header files might contain information that tells the compiler to inline the wrapper when possible. In this case it won't succeed either.
Marcel
(interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?
Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?