Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à cu programmer 
Sujet : Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?
De : 643-408-1753 (at) *nospam* kylheku.com (Kaz Kylheku)
Groupes : comp.unix.programmer
Date : 20. Jan 2025, 20:42:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <20250120113535.134@kylheku.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
On 2025-01-20, Kenny McCormack <gazelle@shell.xmission.com> wrote:
In article <vmlmkp$36kmo$1@dont-email.me>,
Kalevi Kolttonen <kalevi@kolttonen.fi> wrote:
Muttley@dastardlyhq.org wrote:
On a slight tangent, does anyone know of a good
reference for how to use the ptrace() call on
Linux? The man page is somewhat obtuse.
>
Just guessing, but I can only think of reading
gdb source code.
>
Or strace.

Since ptrace is something implemented in the kernel, a peek at that
could also be useful, where the documentation is lacking.

This site is very nice for hyperlinked, cross-indexed browsing,
featuring pretty much every version of the kernel, ever,
from linux 0.01 to current (6.13.x, presently).

https://elixir.bootlin.com/

You can jump to uses and definitions of identifiers and such.
I use this as a resource in the context of embedded work.

--
TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr
Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal
Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 Jan 25 * (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?16Kenny McCormack
17 Jan 25 +* Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?2Kenny McCormack
18 Jan 25 i`- Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?1Kaz Kylheku
18 Jan 25 `* Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?13Richard Kettlewell
18 Jan 25  `* Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?12Kenny McCormack
19 Jan 25   `* Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?11Marcel Mueller
19 Jan 25    `* Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?10Richard Kettlewell
19 Jan 25     +* Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?5Kenny McCormack
19 Jan 25     i`* Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?4Marcel Mueller
19 Jan 25     i +* Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?2Kenny McCormack
20 Jan 25     i i`- Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?1Marcel Mueller
20 Jan 25     i `- Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?1Richard Kettlewell
20 Jan 25     `* Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?4Muttley
20 Jan 25      `* Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?3Kalevi Kolttonen
20 Jan 25       `* Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?2Kenny McCormack
20 Jan 25        `- Re: (interposers): How to workaround the "strong symbols" problem?1Kaz Kylheku

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal