cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) gabbled:
In article <10rtgq7$2h4os$1@dont-email.me>, <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:On Fri, 17 Apr 2026 14:04:20 -0000 (UTC)>
cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) gabbled:In article <10rt267$1eh57$1@dont-email.me>, <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:>>On Thu, 16 Apr 2026 20:29:37 +0100>
A hacked version of ssh could save or forward everything it receives.
Not if it can't read the host key because it doesn't have
permissions to open the file the key is stored in, and so it
Why wouldn't it have permissions if a user has set up the whole thing?
....because the file containing the host private key is owned by
root, and not the user? And the client has a cached copy of the
host public key locally whent hey connect?
Oh FFS, the hacker server would use whatever keys the hacker wanted it to
use. Do try and keep up.
Irrelevant. A hacked ssh server could do anything the hacker wants with the>
decrypted data.
What decrypted data? Authentication of the incoming connection
*plonk*
I honestly can't be bothered.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.