Sujet : Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl
De : smirzo (at) *nospam* example.com (Salvador Mirzo)
Groupes : comp.unix.questionsDate : 14. Dec 2024, 22:51:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <87cyhuexvv.fsf@example.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Paul <
nospam@needed.invalid> writes:
On Fri, 12/13/2024 6:49 PM, Salvador Mirzo wrote:
[...]
Someone (maybe you) suggested I should change my PuTTY terminal-type
string to vt100. I did. Same result:
$ uname -a
FreeBSD my.domain 14.1-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 14.1-RELEASE-p5 GENERIC amd64
$ echo $TERM
vt100
$ rlwrap sbcl
This is SBCL 2.4.9, an implementation of ANSI Common Lisp.
More information about SBCL is available at <http://www.sbcl.org/>.
SBCL is free software, provided as is, with absolutely no warranty.
It is mostly in the public domain; some portions are provided under
BSD-style licenses. See the CREDITS and COPYING files in the
distribution for more information.
* (f(format t "hello~%")
hello
NIL
>
The pattern is not suggestive of a $TERM problem, but it was
worth trying a change anyway.
>
Perhaps the rlwrap developer recognizes the pattern ?
Good idea. I asked them at
https://github.com/hanslub42/rlwrap/issues/194Thanks for your attention, Paul!
xterm rlwrap sbcl
Re: xterm rlwrap sbcl