Sujet : Re: why X
De : gazelle (at) *nospam* shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Groupes : comp.windows.xDate : 22. May 2024, 16:51:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : The official candy of the new Millennium
Message-ID : <v2l4at$19ra3$2@news.xmission.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <
v2etjf$3savv$1@dont-email.me>, <
Muttley@dastardlyhq.com> wrote:
...
It seems to me the main argument for Wayland is "Its not X". When you try and
Change or die.
(aka, change for change's sake)
find out what its actual advantages are you get vague nonsense about
security and lack of cruft and a faster graphic instruction -> hardware path
, which may be true but the difference will be minimal with modern X
extensions and all but invisible with 99.9% of graphical applications unless
you maybe care about 60fps vs 65fps in some game.
>
The Raspberry Pi world recently made the switch. They claim better
performance on their "big" boards (the Pi4 and Pi5), but retain X for their
earlier models.
Which, on the face of it, is odd, since you would think you'd care the most
about performance on the lesser boards. No, I'm not looking for an
explanation of this.
-- Hindsight is (supposed to be) 2020.Trumpers, don't make the same mistake twice.Don't shoot yourself in the feet - and everywhere else - again!.