Cela ne changera rien étant donné que junk a usuellement un statut ne permettant pas de posts directs (n ou j) :junk en mode n (no posting) dans /var/lib/news/active,Et donc la question subsidiaire, est-ce que rajouter junk dans le champ
INN rejette par design.
Newsgroups (ce qui est fatal pour usenet-fr.net) fait que cela devient
acceptable pour INN ?
"n" Posting is not permitted.
"j" Only articles from peers are permitted; no articles are locally
filed.
J'avais passé un peu de temps à analyser et décrire le comportement des serveurs de nouvelles par rapport à junk quand je m'étais plongé dans la RFC 6048. Par rapport à ta question : "an article posted explicitly to "junk" is treated according to the status of the "junk" newsgroup."
NOTE: Instead of not filing at all an article posted to a
newsgroup with status "j", a news server MAY file it under a
catch-all group if no valid group is applicable. When a news
server uses a catch-all group to file the articles posted to
newsgroups with status "j", this catch-all group SHOULD be named
"junk". (The first letter of the "junk" newsgroup explains why
this status has been called "j".)
Consequently, when a news server carries the "junk" newsgroup and
uses it for the purpose of the "j" status, the "junk" newsgroup
contains all postings not filed under another newsgroup,
regardless of the status of the "junk" newsgroup. (However, an
article posted explicitly to "junk" is treated according to the
status of the "junk" newsgroup.)
The "junk" newsgroup may be available to news readers and is often
used by a news server as a way to locally store an article that
will be transmitted to peers (which may carry some of the
newsgroups the article was posted to even if the local server does
not). In addition, instead of rejecting an article that contains
an invalid Newsgroups header field or that is posted to newsgroups
it does not carry, a news server may accept such an article and
file it under the catch-all newsgroup.
Depending on the configuration of the news server, mentioning a
newsgroup with status "j" is different than simply not listing the
group, since articles arriving for unknown newsgroups may be
rejected.
S'il faut vraiment que certains utilisateurs puissent poster dans un groupe au statut restreint, INN permet ce genre de paramétrage :)Mais propose quand même une solution. ça vous intéresse ?Bien sûr.
À voir du côté de readers.conf...
Par exemple avec :
access : RPANL
L The client may post to newsgroups that are set to disallow local
posting (status fields "j", "n" and "x" in the active(5) file).
RPAN => droits pour Read, Post, Approve, NEWNEWS
--
Julien ÉLIE
« Si Dieu n'est pas marié, pourquoi parle-t-on de sa grande Clémence ? »
(Raymond Devos)
| Date | Sujet | # | Auteur | |
| 17 Apr 26 |  Configuration junk (was: Re: junk) | 5 | yamo' | |
| 17 Apr 26 |   Re: Configuration junk | 1 | Olivier Miakinen | |
| 17 Apr 26 |  Re: Configuration junk (was: Re: junk) | 3 | Jo Engo | |
| 17 Apr 26 |  Re: Configuration junk | 2 | Olivier Miakinen | |
| 18 Apr 26 | Re: Configuration junk | 1 | Julien ÉLIE |
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.