Sujet : Re: Upcoming time boundary events
De : clubley (at) *nospam* remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP (Simon Clubley)
Groupes : comp.os.vmsDate : 27. May 2025, 13:15:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <1014ad8$2jurh$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : slrn/0.9.8.1 (VMS/Multinet)
On 2025-05-23, Robert A. Brooks <
FIRST.LAST@vmssoftware.com> wrote:
On 5/23/2025 14:11, Simon Clubley wrote:
The details are vague since it's been several years since I looked at
DECnet Phase IV, but there's a signed integer delta date field somewhere
in DECnet Phase IV (from a base date offset) that overflowed, at least
if you followed the spec, in 2021 (IIRC). I do remember that VMS treated
it as an unsigned integer, hence VMS wasn't affected.
I _think_ it was in EVL, but I can't be sure now.
I fixed that one; it'll be good until my 100th birthday.
>
$ set response/mode=good_natured
I wonder if people will have stopped using DECnet Phase IV by then ? :-)
These old protocols have a habit of staying around a lot longer than
expected. For example, I suspect somewhere people are still using UUCP,
2780/3780, xmodem, DDCMP, original SNA (not SNA over TCP/IP), etc, ...
I wonder how old you have to be to recognise any of the above these days ? :-)
Simon.
-- Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFPWalking destinations on a map are further away than they appear.