Sujet : Re: working to swiftly rectify the situation
De : nospam (at) *nospam* example.net (D)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discussDate : 23. Feb 2025, 11:25:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <19ecd8a9-818a-74b4-43a8-b01984c05166@example.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
On Sat, 22 Feb 2025, JAB wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 00:25:01 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
I'm opposed to HAL 9000 flying airplanes...a PIC is needed
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARJ8cAGm6JE
>
Why?
>
A faulty sensor or off calibrated sensor can fool HAL, unless all
"what ifs" are within programming.
>
Autonomous vehicles ain't there yet....
A faulty sensor can throw off a pilot as well. Planes are not self driving cars. Much easier to automate than cars. Less people, cats, and dogs to avoid.
working to swiftly rectify the situation
Re: working to swiftly rectify the situation