Re: Without me, Trump would have lost the election

JAB <here@is.invalid> writes:

I suspect most of the domestic and foreign policy has been determined
by others.  Domestic via Project 2025, and tariffs for foreign policy
(which he himself did not plan the details).

Trump is far too cognitively/mentally disordered to have said,
proposed or planned anything whatever of substance.

Trump's enablers, the people who *have* injected matters of substance
are not buddies or birds of a feather.  Vought, Vance/Thiel, Miller,
Navarro, Posobiec, Musk, Noem and others are a very heterogeneous bag
with widely differing, sometimes hostile agendas -- personal,
political, financial or combination of those.

Their only point of intersection is their perceived need to "burn it
all down", demolish the existing order to clear the burdensome
structure of government out of the way of their goals.  Trump has been
singularly helpful to them all in this task.

But a time will come, possibly quite soon, when they have to rid
themselves of Trump because he is so demented that he can't be relied
upon to support and effectively enable any one of the several
disparate agendas to step into the results of arson and pull the new
order together out of chaos.

It's a problem for the enablers.

This sounds to me like a scenario of sufficient complexity that a
pattern-deducing or -inferring AI could be consulted to sort out the
conflicting strands -- those of post-constitutional or post-democratic or
post-enlightenment or pro-techno-oligarchy among other variants -- and
propose a strategy to put the new order into place.

Publicly available AI chatbots appear to be so constrained that they
correctly see a request to do that as seeking help with illegal,
revolutionary, unconstitutional planning.  It's a safe guess that not
all AI systems are so constrained.

Ho hum, more bother.

--
Mike Spencer                  Nova Scotia, Canada