Sujet : Re: Some good news!
De : nospam (at) *nospam* example.net (D)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discussDate : 06. Feb 2025, 10:23:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <8b4b5a1a-7cb6-b3ff-2c7d-08b9f44e05b6@example.net>
References : 1 2 3 4
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025, Auric Hellman wrote:
On 2/5/2025 4:59 AM, D wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2025, Auric Hellman wrote:
On 2/4/2025 1:40 PM, JAB wrote:
Judge rules that Black church in DC, which won a $2.8 million default
judgment against the Proud Boys, now gains control over the trademark
"Proud Boys." The far-right group is barred from selling any related
merchandise or symbols without the consent of the church.
https://bsky.app/profile/espiers.bsky.social/post/3lhendiwpuk2r
Current politics aside, I'm shocked that any Black man would allow himself to be addressed as "Boy", regardless of the prefix.
True... but the problem is that in a country with freedom of speech, other may choose to address him as boy, negro or nigra. He may not like it, he may choose not to listen, but at the end of the day, it is not up to him what others choose to call him.
>
>
The isn't the case here; people weren't just calling them "boy". They went to court and legally acquired the name.
Surely it is not the verbal expression? That's absurd! Isn't it a logo or brand together with graphics?
Some good news!
Re: Some good news!