Re: 'Rats in the Kitchen'

On Fri, 13 Dec 2024, JAB wrote:

On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 11:45:24 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>

But, the fact that people are celebrating that someone lost her
husband, and someone their father is an interesting fact.

>
Fact: Health insurance companies don't care if a person lives or dies,
but they do care about shareholders' profits, very much.

Companies do not care about anything. They are not living entities, so cannot care. The people who work for them care, or they don't.
But do note that in fact there can be no obligation to save anyone, since that would make one part of the population, slaves to the other. So ethically this is not possible.
Of course, people can, and do, save people voluntarily, so this is usually not a problem.
In the US, what must be done, is to deregulate and privatize the healthcare system, and reform the legal system, that gives rise to excessive damage claims, which gives rise to sky rocketing insurance costs, and absurd liability questions.
Only this way will there be peace.
But in terms of forcing people to be doctors and forcing them to give treatments, is completely unfeasible, and ethically wrong.

Bonus Fact: Rs stand by their "man" (health ins companies), and don't
give a shit about "Pro Life" after they are born.
>
"Denying healthcare coverage to people is murder, but no one gets
charged with that crime," one donor wrote, calling the killing a
"justifiable homicide."
>