Sujet : Re: Did Zuck's definition of 'free expression'
De : here (at) *nospam* is.invalid (JAB)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discussDate : 15. Jan 2025, 22:36:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vm99o9$34goe$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On 14 Jan 2025 03:05:05 GMT, Retrograde <
fungus@amongus.com.invalid>
wrote:
Hey Zuck, how's the Metaverse going
Prominent Bay Area lawyer skewers Mark Zuckerberg, fires Meta as a
client
The Stanford professor said he refuses to be associated with
Zuckerberg and Meta, given the company's new content and workplace
policies
https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/bay-area-lawyer-mark-lemley-fires-zuckerberg-meta-20034699.php
Did Zuck's definition of 'free expression'
Re: Did Zuck's definition of 'free expression'