Sujet : Re: first UK jailterm for cyberflashing
De : here (at) *nospam* is.invalid (JAB)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discussDate : 20. Mar 2024, 20:54:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <utfet3$1m60u$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 18:51:14 +0000, "Kerr-Mudd, John"
<
admin@127.0.0.1> wrote:
That's awful; but it's hardly the same type of exposure?
Yes/No...an employee was under a company's policy to report
"pornographic" photos. It was "unsolicited" in manner of speaking if
the parents knew about Walmart's policy.
Photos of this nature were not uncommon many years ago in the 1950s,
btw.
first UK jailterm for cyberflashing
Re: first UK jailterm for cyberflashing