Re: New Lousiana law requires

Liste des GroupesRevenir à mni discuss 
Sujet : Re: New Lousiana law requires
De : nospam (at) *nospam* example.net (D)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discuss
Date : 20. Jun 2024, 09:05:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <718c7b0f-4722-db56-0e3c-808dbfb8767e@example.net>
References : 1 2 3
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024, JAB wrote:

On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 22:28:06 +0200, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
If they were serious about that argument
>
It's political showboating, and a waste of taxpayers dollars since the
courts will not defend their grandstanding.
>
Upshot from founding fathers was you can believe what you want, but
don't harm others with your beliefs.
>
I always get this unreal feeling when we find something we agree on. Is it a good sign or a bad sign? ;)

Date Sujet#  Auteur
19 Jun 24 * New Lousiana law requires11JAB
19 Jun 24 `* Re: New Lousiana law requires10D
20 Jun 24  +* Re: New Lousiana law requires3JAB
20 Jun 24  i+- Re: New Lousiana law requires1D
20 Jun 24  i`- Re: New Lousiana law requires1D
21 Jun 24  `* Re: New Lousiana law requires6JAB
21 Jun 24   `* Re: New Lousiana law requires5JAB
22 Jun 24    `* Re: New Lousiana law requires4JAB
22 Jun 24     `* Re: New Lousiana law requires3JAB
23 Jun 24      `* Re: New Lousiana law requires2Danart
23 Jun 24       `- Re: New Lousiana law requires1JAB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal