Liste des Groupes | Revenir à mni discuss |
On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 12:02:39 +0200, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:Actually in science, all it takes is one example to disprove a theory. Economics is not a science perhaps? ;)
>UBI was tried with disastrous results in the>
soviet union, so it is disproven both financially and historically.
One example does not 'prove' the concept is fruitless.
I believe Elon is living in a Sci-Fi or bullshit world when he says,I believe we could reach that, but that would take 100s of years if not more. But it is a fun example to calculate and speculate around. We would need massive technological breakthroughs in power generation, power storage, robotics, automation and various kinds of AI. At least! I also wonder if we also perhaps need to open up new areas as well for raw materials such as deep sea mining and asteroid mining?
"here will come a point where no job is needed -you can have a job if
you want one for personal satisfaction - but AI will do everything."
===========================
This study gives a sense of what could happen, but I believe theirYep, fully offset. Ice delivery was replaced with other jobs when refrigerators came. Also note that todays economy is global, so to give an accurate picture, you cannot just look at one country.
finding that "additional jobs in the service sector" came about is
bumstear thinking as more/more robots are "employed."
>
30/2017
>
German Robots - The Impact of Industrial Robots on Workers
...
...
Conclusion
>
In this paper we have studied the impact of rising robot exposure on
the careers of individual manufacturing workers, and the equilibrium
impact across industries and local labor markets in Germany. Unlike in
the United States, we find no evidence that robots have been major job
killers so far. They do no not cause overall job losses, but they do
affect the composition of aggregate employment in Germany. We estimate
that every robot destroys roughly two manufacturing jobs. This implies
a total loss of 275,000 manufacturing jobs in the period 1994-2014,
which accounts for roughly 23% of the overall decline during those two
decades. But this loss was fully offset (or even slightly
over-compensated) by additional jobs in the service sector.
>
https://doku.iab.de/discussionpapers/2017/dp3017.pdf
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.