> Retrograde wrote:
> From the «so basic bullshit» department:
> Title: We unleashed Facebook and Instagramâs algorithms on blank
accounts. They served up sexism and misogyny
> Author: Josh Taylor
> Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 20:00:45 +0000
> Link:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/jul/21/we-unleashed-facebook-and-instagrams-algorithms-on-blank-accounts-they-served-up-sexism-and-misogyny > Podcast Download URL:
https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/730ac82d6fdd99b0160f3046e3e578c39bb72268/2_0_5903_3543/master/5903.jpg?width=460&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=71cc96582175e0250a4cb272da3e1d92 >
> Result of Guardian Australia experiment aligns with research
showing social
> media automatically delivers troubling content to young men,
largely without
> oversight
>
> * Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates[1]
> * Get our morning and afternoon news emails[2], free app[3] or
daily news
> podcast[4]
>
> How do the algorithms of Facebook and Instagram affect what you see
in your
> news feed? To find out, Guardian Australia unleashed them on a
completely blank
> smartphone linked to a new, unused email address.
>
> Three months later, without any input, they were riddled with
sexist and
> misogynistic content.
> Continue reading...[5]
>
> Links:
> [1]:
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2024/jul/21/australia-news-live-microsoft-says-crowdstrike-outage-affected-85m-windows-devices(link)
> [2]:
https://www.theguardian.com/email-newsletters?CMP=cvau_sfl(link)
> [3]:
https://app.adjust.com/w4u7jx3 (link)
> [4]:
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/series/full-story?CMP=cvau_sfl(link)
> [5]:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/article/2024/jul/21/we-unleashed-facebook-and-instagrams-algorithms-on-blank-accounts-they-served-up-sexism-and-misogyny(link)
For the sake of our sanity, what was the report
comments?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2v-1emgJ674Like in the Link above, he actually provides a link to studies
conducted. It is like that movie "THX1337"
or "Fractured". Everybody is claim but something is
wrong...............
"Your dying"
"Nope your okay"
"Your not going to make it"
"Nope your going to"
"be aware"
"Relax"
You could be dying or being held against your will without knowing and
because people go up against your high
standards. Like turning a lion into a snake on it's belly, when in
reality it is a lion, and no matter how many times
the lion does it's best, it is often pushed into the mentality of
being a snake.
Cherry picking of course.
So I check out the guardian article a bit? So what? An account with
photography of somebody in
swim-suits? Why is that a big deal? What is it suppose to be, fat,
pugly, rugged, witches?
Like the one time Brock Sampson met his opposite-sex equal, from
"Venture Brothers", or Mortisha
Adams in that movie, where she ripped her face off ( like Jane Jetson
) AKA "Witch".
I am telling the source of School Shooters is this vajayjay equality
bs, pushed on youths. First as a
benefit to the single mothers. For those like-minded usually will not
fit in well. Being a man is part of
being "that way" people.
If all of these school shooters, had clean tight p _ s s y at some
point, non of them would have turned
out the way they did. All the loners, all the people who will get
angry at you. Like the good days when a
wealthy man would hold his son up via gun-point, and be like "You
f u c k this girl ( high class hooker, or
some girl from another town over, who is clean and does not look like
alien-downstairs ) or you face the
shot-gun". That is how things was before color television.
But because the Central-Banker had a plan to distort the Christian.
First using racism, then using feminism, and
finally using the LGBT in an attempt to confuse us. Now we are stray
dog people. No parents without there
parents scattered across the world. Being told we are less then human,
or to die. They make w-hores of our
daughters and murders out of our sons.
.......
They made an account of pretty girls in swimsuits and got back
bro-dude jokes. Most of them are okay, but honestly
not for everybody.
This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=670274717#670274717