Sujet : Re: Musk urged to get a grip on X
De : here (at) *nospam* is.invalid (JAB)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discussDate : 09. Aug 2024, 18:06:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v95ia5$qktn$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 10:46:19 +0200, D <
nospam@example.net> wrote:
The "crying 'FIRE' in a crowded theater" concept desperately needs to
be updated.
>
That's nonsense. Theaters are private, which means the owner sets the
rules, just like the owner of Twitter sets the rules.
On a different note, do read:
By winning the battle against GARM, Elon Musk will lose the war
...
...
The upside to today's news is that advertisers will no longer rely on
GARM and will now take more direct responsibility over where their ads
appear.
This is a fast-moving industry. With this change, consumers,
advertisers, news publishers, and even regulators have an opportunity
to set new clear standards for how the internet should be governed.
This change does not mean that ads will start sponsoring hate again.
In fact, the opposite is true: brands and their employees are more
clear than ever about what they want to be associated with -- and what
they want to avoid.
https://checkmyads.org/elon-musk-garm-lawsuit/