Sujet : Re: Independent analysis of the US democrats and Kennedy Jr. by one of swedens better journalists.
De : nospam (at) *nospam* example.net (D)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discussDate : 11. Sep 2024, 08:55:53
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <79f4f892-ffde-a309-d8d0-2a6b07ecd117@example.net>
References : 1 2
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024, JAB wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 22:34:57 +0200, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
This is how the Democrats approach their defectors---as victims to external
forces, rather than as individuals questioning the party's internal
contradictions. If a person deviates from the party norm, it is the person
and not the party norm that is in the wrong.
>
Piled High, and Deep...Quite an imagination this author has.
>
contradictions.
>
I believe all organizations tend to have contradictions, including the
medical profession, or even Malin Ekman.
>
The Democrats still hold the image of a party that stands up for the
little guy against big and powerful interests. At the same time, it is
accused of being top-down and authoritarian beyond what is considered
standard for a political party seeking to govern a democratic society.
>
>
Specifics are missing...using the "accused" word is meaningless unless
specific examples are given.
>
This author should have listened to Liz_Cheney and her dad in regards
to authoritarian aspect.
>
That's why I like you. You take me out of my own echo chamber. ;)