Re: election interference

Liste des GroupesRevenir à mni discuss 
Sujet : Re: election interference
De : adhellman1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Auric Hellman)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discuss
Date : 18. Oct 2024, 21:32:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Sons of Rhodesia
Message-ID : <veugl7$3f7pg$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/18/2024 2:29 PM, JAB wrote:
Judge Chutkan's 5-page order rejecting Trump's request to keep
materials secret until after the election: "If the court withheld
information that the public otherwise had a right to access solely
because of the potential political consequences of releasing it, that
withholding could itself constitute -- or appear to be -- election
interference."
 https://x.com/stengel/status/1847262378171486700
This judge appears to have an axe to grind, judging by her recent history pertaining to the events of Jan 6. With having been both doxed and swatted, her attitude is somewhat understood.
--
Dr. Auric D. Hellman
adhellman1@gmail.com

Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 Oct 24 * election interference7JAB
18 Oct 24 `* Re: election interference6Auric Hellman
19 Oct 24  +- Re: election interference1JAB
19 Oct 24  `* Re: election interference4D
19 Oct 24   `* Re: election interference3JAB
19 Oct 24    `* Re: election interference2D
20 Oct 24     `- Re: election interference1JAB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal