Re: election interference

On Fri, 18 Oct 2024, Auric Hellman wrote:

On 10/18/2024 2:29 PM, JAB wrote:

Judge Chutkan's 5-page order rejecting Trump's request to keep
materials secret until after the election: "If the court withheld
information that the public otherwise had a right to access solely
because of the potential political consequences of releasing it, that
withholding could itself constitute -- or appear to be -- election
interference."
 https://x.com/stengel/status/1847262378171486700

>
>
>
This judge appears to have an axe to grind, judging by her recent history pertaining to the events of Jan 6. With having been both doxed and swatted, her attitude is somewhat understood.

But not justified. Behaviour like that shows that the judge holds personal vendettas higher than the law.