Sujet : Re: election interference
De : here (at) *nospam* is.invalid (JAB)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discussDate : 19. Oct 2024, 16:51:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vf0khk$3ula2$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 11:16:48 +0200, D <
nospam@example.net> wrote:
Behaviour like that shows
I'm not aware of a legal doctrine suggesting a person's claimed "dirty
laundry" should be hidden for a candidate. In a democracy, making an
exception for political candidates would not be fair, since the rest
of us can't choose a time when the dirty laundry is exposed. And,
needless to say, voters should have a 'fair/balanced' understanding.
In any event, those voting for the moralless one are not concerned
about his piles and piles of dirty laundry.