Re: "he's a piece of s---"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à mni discuss 
Sujet : Re: "he's a piece of s---"
De : here (at) *nospam* is.invalid (JAB)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discuss
Date : 11. Nov 2024, 19:09:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vgth8q$140i3$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 10:51:30 -0500, Michael Trew
<michael.trew@att.net> wrote:

I don't see the correlation.  Those are two very different types of
"cheating".  Are you trying to say that she got what she deserved with
an abusive husband, because she "cheated" with business practices?

Article
"The current wife of Martha Stewart's former husband, Andrew Stewart,
has spoken out against claims made in the lifestyle mogul's new
Netflix documentary."

His current wife says, "As some of you know, my husband is Andrew
Stewart - brilliant publisher, avocational naturalist and nature
photographer, and one of the gentlest, most soft-spoken, kind-hearted
men I've ever known,"

Humans generally do not transform from a beast to a "one of the
gentlest, most soft-spoken, kind-hearted men I've ever known," in
their second marriage.  That's an extreme behavioral change.

"cheated" with business practices?

Making money on a film makes more with spices added.  Yes, a person
who cheats on one topic would have no reservations about cheating
(lying) elsewhere if it profits them.

Example, examine political behavior....they will change their tunes,
and become moral-less, if needed to retain their office/etc..

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Nov 24 * "he's a piece of s---"2JAB
11 Nov 24 `- Re: "he's a piece of s---"1JAB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal