Re: Ten Commandments

Liste des GroupesRevenir à mni discuss 
Sujet : Re: Ten Commandments
De : here (at) *nospam* is.invalid (JAB)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discuss
Date : 13. Nov 2024, 15:09:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vh2buo$282e1$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 10:19:59 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

But I think this might be appealed up to the supreme court,

Everson v. Board of Education(1947) - In Everson v. Board of
Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947), the Supreme Court ruled as
constitutional a New Jersey statute allocating taxpayer funds to bus
children to religious schools -- because it did not breach the "wall
of separation" between church and state -- and held that the
establishment clause of the First Amendment applied to state and local
governments as well as to the federal government.

https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/everson-v-board-of-education/

Court used 'wall of separation' metaphor to announce strict separation
of church, state

https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/wall-of-separation/

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Nov 24 * Ten Commandments3JAB
13 Nov 24 `* Re: Ten Commandments2D
13 Nov 24  `- Re: Ten Commandments1JAB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal