Sujet : Re: AI poetry
De : michael.trew (at) *nospam* att.net (Michael Trew)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discussDate : 18. Nov 2024, 15:01:36
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <673b48ca$2$3620703$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.1
On 11/17/2024 9:17 PM, Retrograde wrote:
From the «fer fuck's sake, William» department:
Title: AI poetry out-humans humans as readers prefer bots to bards
Author: Lindsay Clark
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 09:41:10 +0000
Link: https://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.com/2024/11/17/ai_poetry_study/
Uncultured swine prone to believe complexity of verse is machine-generated
babble
A study in the US has found that readers can't tell the difference between
poems written by famous poets and those written by AI aping their style. To
make matters worse – for anyone fostering a love of literature at least –
research subjects tend to like AI poetry more than they do verse from human
poets.…
That's bizarre. I can usually spot AI from a mile away. Things "written" by AI are very repetitive and vague, generally.
AI poetry
Re: AI poetry