Liste des Groupes | Revenir à mni discuss |
On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 10:18:53 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:I don't care about Ann Landers, so this argument is very weak. I reject her flawed reasoning, so we're even stephen!
>My assumption is that we are all responisble for our own lives, and we>
have freedom of speech. The ones who are not so well mentally, have
caretakers, friends or family, who can (but are not forced to) take care
of them.
>
Therefore, there is no problem with Trump saying what he did, since
it is not a huge assumption that most adults are smart enough to
understand that.
Ann Landers would reject your flawed reasoning since her "ethics were
generally considered to be based on promoting empathy, honesty, and
personal responsibility."
>
Personal responsibility is where he fails....Greatly.
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.