Re: GOP "racists"

On Wed, 1 Jan 2025, JAB wrote:

On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 12:26:55 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>

but if you
broaden your views, you will realize that the capitalist system has done
more for raising the standards of living for mankind than all socialist
and communist dictatorships taken together, and then some.

>
Amish/etc don't need a capitalist system...I don't believe they use
rubber tires on their equipment.

Incorrect.
The Amish do use currency to buy and sell goods and services. While the Amish community is known for its simple lifestyle and rejection of many modern conveniences, they do engage in commerce and use money, typically in the form of cash or checks, for transactions.
Key Points:
Cash Transactions: Many Amish businesses operate on a cash-only basis, and cash is commonly used for everyday purchases.
Checks: Some Amish individuals may also use personal checks for larger transactions or when dealing with non-Amish businesses.
Bartering: In some cases, especially within their communities, the Amish may engage in bartering, exchanging goods or services without using money.
Local Economy: The Amish often support local businesses and may sell their products, such as handmade crafts, furniture, and food items, at local markets or through direct sales.
Overall, while the Amish lifestyle emphasizes simplicity and self-sufficiency, they do participate in the economy and use currency for transactions.

raising the standards of living

>
Global warming, shit piled deep during horse days, air pollution, etc.

Capitalist countries are actually cleaner and more environmentally friendly than
non-capitalist ones. Do you know why? Because they are much richer, they can
actually afford to take care of nature. That is something non-capitalist
countries cannot do.

Obesity issues....Alcohol/drug issues....

Yet, today, globally, we live longer than ever, so your two examples are not
correct.

It's an implicit employer threat...did you notice how Musk fired

>
This is not correct. This is an inherent part of the contract

>
I don't believe when Musk took over Twitter, existing contract stated
extra hours were required...he demanded it  The senior programmers
normally do not write much code, and iirc, Musk fired those who were
not writing much code.

You must produce proof! Also, it is common business practice to re-negotiate
contracts. Especially when new owners take over a company.

Contract - Irreverent comment when the implicit threat of being fired
exists, under a ruthless CEO/etc.  I doubt you would last long under
the Musk kingdom.

Incorrect statement. Musk and I would have quite a bromance, and within shortly
I would soar to unimaginable heights under his guidance.

Remember, there are the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly CEOs, and Musk is
no saint.

No billionaire is a saint. We are in spiritual and loving agreement on this.