Sujet : Re: GOP "racists"
De : nospam (at) *nospam* example.net (D)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discussDate : 03. Jan 2025, 12:49:52
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <6136b13e-b1e4-c337-2d08-126f3e4ae330@example.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
On Thu, 2 Jan 2025, JAB wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 12:40:11 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
You must produce proof!
>
"Lines of code written in the past year" was his metric.
>
https://blog.developerpurpose.com/elon-musk-just-force-ranked-twitter-engineers-fired-the-bottom-507ab35b659a
>
>
This is not proof.
>
Circumstantial evidence was given...proof was not defined or requested
in terms of direct or circumstantial evidence.
So you cannot give anything but circumstancial evidence? This is not so good. =( You do know that circumstancial evidence makes Jesus cry, don't you?
Proof - evidence or argument establishing or helping to establish a
fact or the truth of a statement.
>
AI Overview
>
Difference between Direct Evidence and Circumstantial ...
Circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence that relies on an
inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. It's the opposite of
direct evidence, which directly supports the truth of an assertion
>