Sujet : Re: Did Zuck's definition of 'free expression'
De : nospam (at) *nospam* example.net (D)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discussDate : 16. Jan 2025, 16:49:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <0639a9b4-04b4-491c-8625-a39fd1816f6e@example.net>
References : 1 2 3
On Wed, 15 Jan 2025, JAB wrote:
On 14 Jan 2025 03:05:05 GMT, Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid>
wrote:
>
Hey Zuck, how's the Metaverse going
>
Prominent Bay Area lawyer skewers Mark Zuckerberg, fires Meta as a
client
>
The Stanford professor said he refuses to be associated with
Zuckerberg and Meta, given the company's new content and workplace
policies
>
https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/bay-area-lawyer-mark-lemley-fires-zuckerberg-meta-20034699.php
>
Who cares? Plenty more where he came from. I am still enjoying Z:s sudden conversion to freedom of speech immensely. He sure doesn't bite the hand that feeds him. ;)
Did Zuck's definition of 'free expression'
Re: Did Zuck's definition of 'free expression'