Sujet : Re: Did Zuck's definition of 'free expression'
De : fungus (at) *nospam* amongus.com.invalid (Retrograde)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discussDate : 17. Jan 2025, 03:52:48
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <6789c5fe$13$33593$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2025-01-16, JAB <
here@is.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 16:49:58 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
I am still enjoying Z:s
sudden conversion to freedom of speech immensely.
>
Issue here is the Capitalists have been feeding Trump in the hopes his
tariffs/etc will not be aimed at their businesses.
>
Too much knee-bending here, but if they stood United, Trump's game
would come to an end.
>
Pretty sure the word is "Toadyism" and it's pretty galling to watch.
$1M for inauguration party, fuckers. Got homeless and needy on all
sides.
Really hoping Zuck decides to drive a Tesla™ Cyberweenie that suffers a
catastrophic locking misfunction and catches on fire.
Did Zuck's definition of 'free expression'
Re: Did Zuck's definition of 'free expression'