Sujet : Re: Did Zuck's definition of 'free expression'
De : nospam (at) *nospam* example.net (D)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discussDate : 18. Jan 2025, 11:30:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <6081310f-baf7-e7d7-b85c-4b1849c99562@example.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025, Retrograde wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 20:06:20 -0600
JAB <here@is.invalid> wrote:
>
On 17 Jan 2025 02:52:48 GMT, Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid>
wrote:
>
Pretty sure the word is "Toadyism"
>
"My one wish for the inauguration is that there is a gift bag under
the seats of Bezos, Zuck, Elon etc, with a single, embroidered ,
padded knee pad
>
Need to protect themselves when they are on bended knee, kissing the
ring"
>
They're going to need two kneepads, not one; so they can (obviously)
stay comfortable while gargling the ole man's ballsack.
>
I heard the US nuclear codes are stored inside the sack. Can anyone confirm?
Did Zuck's definition of 'free expression'
Re: Did Zuck's definition of 'free expression'