Sujet : Re: kakistocracy
De : here (at) *nospam* is.invalid (JAB)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discussDate : 21. Jan 2025, 14:43:46
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vmo8ak$46cn$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:21:28 +0100, D <
nospam@example.net> wrote:
plutocracy - rule by the wealthy
kleptocracy - rule by corrupt thieves
kakistocracy - rule by the worst, least qualified
https://bsky.app/profile/tristansnell.bsky.social/post/3lg7hmt2hvk2s
>
>
Looking at the salaries and bank accounts of most western politicians, I'd
say that western democracy is indeed in most cases kleptocracies.
I would think plutocracy has always played a role. Even in US's
beginnings, the creation of Patent Act of 1790 protects those who
succeed. US has always supported businesses growth. Kleptocracy, per
se, has not been a major factor, but more of "insider trader"
activities in US. Kakistocracy at the POTUS level depends upon each
POTUS listening to their advisors, and digesting their views.