Sujet : Re: Not a single spy was ever discovered
De : nospam (at) *nospam* example.net (D)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discussDate : 10. Feb 2025, 23:09:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <70f26dc3-b8e9-a296-288d-88601d731f0b@example.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025, Blueshirt wrote:
D wrote:
>
>
The real question is... who is a homo denier? Are you?
>
Sorry to butt in to this very interesting conversation...
You're always welcome!
Am I allowed to ask what a "homo denier" is?
Of course!
Is it somebody who denies entry to a "homo", like not turning
your back to them with your pants down, or is it a "homo" that
denies being a "homo"?
It could also be a straighto who denies the existence of homos!
I just asked the wife, and she liked the homo denying being a homo. Would that be the anti-homo?
In my case, I'd lean towards the straighto denying the existence of homos.
Once we have this very important definition clarified you can
carry on...
Let's do it! =D
[In the meantime, I'll just go and put the kettle on.]
Do you drink Lapsang? It is the ultimate straighto of the teas!
Not a single spy was ever discovered
Re: Not a single spy was ever discovered