Sujet : Re: Not a single spy was ever discovered
De : roach4994 (at) *nospam* gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (cheesetray)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discussDate : 11. Feb 2025, 04:09:45
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <UXGdnZoPz97kIjf6nZ2dnZfqnPYAAAAA@giganews.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : newsSync 683603806
Blueshirt wrote:
Auric Hellman wrote:
On 2/10/2025 10:36 AM, Blueshirt wrote:
D wrote:
The real question is... who is a homo denier? Are you?
Sorry to butt in to this very interesting conversation...
Am I allowed to ask what a "homo denier" is?
Is it somebody who denies entry to a "homo", like not turning
your back to them with your pants down, or is it a "homo"
that denies being a "homo"?
Once we have this very important definition clarified you can
carry on...
Heard this one just a few day ago:
You're laying in bed between a absolutely beautiful wpman on
one side of you and gay man on the other side. Who would you
turn your back to?
That's a trick question! ;-)
THE *DEFENSE* IS *WRONG*!!!!!! (i just had to look that up to make sense of
it!) This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683526632#683526632
Re: Not a single spy was ever discovered