Sujet : Re: Trump's Canada threats may be sparking a Liberal rebound
De : nospam (at) *nospam* example.net (D)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discussDate : 12. Feb 2025, 11:24:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <d3ed1e91-f79a-5ba7-acc8-33bd8cb62fb4@example.net>
References : 1
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025, Auric Hellman wrote:
After months of record-breaking unpopularity, U.S. President Donald Trump’s trade fights with Canada appear to have suddenly given the Liberals a fighting chance of re-election.
>
While the Conservatives remain on track to win a majority in the next election, multiple polls are showing the Liberals rebounding to levels not seen since the summer of 2023.
Don't you worry. The conservatives will win. If not, the country of canada is finished and even though the people enjoy shaking their fists at Trump, they now this, come election day.
Only a month ago, electoral projections were showing the Conservatives likely to win a historic landslide with the Bloc Québécois in opposition and the Liberal Party bumped to a distant fourth place.
>
Now, if an election was held tomorrow, the likely result would be a conventional Conservative majority with the Liberals in opposition.
>
In the last week, four consecutive polls have shown the Liberals capturing around 30 per cent of the popular vote.
>
These are still comparatively dismal numbers for the Liberals, but it was as recently as Dec. 30 that an Angus Reid Institute poll pegged the Liberals with a rock-bottom 16 per cent — the lowest result for the Liberals in the entire history of Canadian polling.
>
By contrast, a Feb. 6 poll by Pallas Data put the Liberals at 33.7 per cent against 39.6 per cent for the Conservatives. When projected out by election modeller Raymond Liu, the Pallas numbers still yielded a Conservative majority of 173 seats, but with vast sections of Greater Toronto and Atlantic Canada still in Liberal hands.
>
>
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/trumps-canada-threats-may-be-sparking-a-liberal-rebound
>
>
They ain't dead yet.
>
>
>
>