Sujet : Re: Gulf
De : nospam (at) *nospam* example.net (D)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discussDate : 13. Feb 2025, 21:53:06
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <62ec0a16-2a14-d691-ecc8-99e27d6a2c36@example.net>
References : 1 2 3
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025, Retrograde wrote:
On 2025-02-13, JAB <here@is.invalid> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 12:12:49 -0600, JAB <here@is.invalid> wrote:
>
PIC
<https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GjjT8FqXEAAGHpE.jpg>
>
Encyclopaeia Britannica will continue to use 'Gulf of Mexico' for a
few reasons:
>
We serve an international audience, a majority of which is outside the
U.S.
>
The Gulf of Mexico is an international body of water, and the U.S.'s
authority to rename it is ambiguous.
>
https://x.com/Britannica/status/1889723591949795671
>
Oh man, that was a good laugh.
>
No balls Google already went along with the renaming. Pussy techbros.
And homo britannica! They are so wooooooooke!
Gulf
Re: Gulf