Sujet : Re: The "Invasion" Executive Order
De : nospam (at) *nospam* example.net (D)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discussDate : 02. Mar 2025, 11:57:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <36efe81e-b1ef-3978-d85c-76041acb8018@example.net>
References : 1 2 3
On Thu, 27 Feb 2025, JAB wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 14:28:09 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
Among other things, it would empower the federal government to detain
people without charge or trial, and open the door for states to engage
>
Isn't this already the case when it comes to arrivals at international
airports?
>
open the door for states to engage in war with neighboring
foreign nations without congressional authorization.
>
I'm not aware of this being active....
>
detain people without charge or trial
>
AI Overview
>
Military given go-ahead to detain US terrorist suspects ...
Yes, the US has detained people without charge or trial, including at
Guantanamo Bay and under the Patriot Act. The American Civil Liberties
Union (ACLU) says this practice is unconstitutional and un-American
>
arrivals at international airports?
>
Border officials follow specific rules and regulations at the port of
entry and may detain individuals who fail to meet certain conditions
required under U.S. immigration laws. Some of the most common reasons
for airport detention include the following:
...
...
https://attlaw.com/airport-detention/
>
If a suspected or known terrorist, do not attempt to enter US.
Or a nazi! Don't go to the US if you're a nazi!
The "Invasion" Executive Order
Re: The "Invasion" Executive Order