What Could Be Done if Donald Trump, as the 47th President, Were a Russian Asset?

What Could Be Done if Donald Trump, as the 47th President, Were a Russian Asset?
If Donald Trump (a sitting US President) or any president of the United States were hypothetically a Russian asset - an agent acting in the interests of Russia over their own country - it'd be a national security crisis of the highest order. The steps to protect the country would depend on what's provable, who's in on it, and how far the influence runs. Here's a breakdown of what could be done, assuming evidence exists and institutions aren't fully compromised:
1. Investigation and Evidence Gathering: The FBI and intelligence agencies (CIA, NSA) would need to dig deep - wiretaps, financial records, intercepted communications, witness testimony. If the president's a Russian asset, there'd likely be a trail: meetings with handlers, offshore accounts, or policy decisions that inexplicably favor Moscow. Congressional committees, like the House or Senate Intelligence Committees, could launch parallel probes.
2. Impeachment: If hard proof surfaces - say, classified docs showing the president taking orders from the Kremlin - Congress could impeach. The House would need a majority to charge (218 votes), and the Senate would need two-thirds (67 votes) to convict and remove. Political will's the bottleneck; partisanship could stall it unless the evidence is airtight and public outrage is deafening.
3. 25th Amendment: If impeachment's too slow or politicized, the vice president and cabinet could invoke the 25th Amendment, declaring the president "unable to discharge the duties of the office." This'd require the VP and a majority of the cabinet (8 of 15) to agree, then fend off any presidential objection with a two-thirds vote in both House and Senate. It's a long shot - loyalists would resist, and it'd spark a constitutional brawl.
4. Military and Intelligence Safeguards: If the president's still in power during this mess, the Pentagon and intel agencies could quietly limit damage. Think: slow-walking orders, tightening classified briefings, or even "losing" critical memos. Risky as hell - borderline mutiny - but it's happened in history when trust collapses (e.g., Nixon's final days).
5. Public Exposure: Leak it all. Whistleblowers, journalists, or X posts could dump raw evidence - audio, docs, whatever - into the public square. If the country sees undeniable proof (not just rumors), it'd force action. Russia's playbook thrives in shadows; sunlight's the best disinfectant.
6. Legal Fallout: Post-removal, the Justice Department could prosecute under laws like the Espionage Act (18 U.S.C.  794) or treason (Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution). Treason's a high bar - it needs two witnesses to an overt act or a confession - but espionage could stick with solid intel. Penalties range from decades in prison to, in extreme cases, death (though that's rare).
Realistically, the system's built to assume loyalty at the top, so every step's a fight. If Russia's that deep in, they've likely got leverage elsewhere - blackmailing senators, hacking infrastructure, or sowing chaos online. Speed and coordination would be critical; delay risks everything from economic sabotage to military exposure (e.g., NATO secrets leaked).
View the attachments for this post at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=685069115#685069115