MummyChunk wrote:
What Could Be Done if Donald Trump, as the 47th President, Were a Russian Asset?
If Donald Trump (a sitting US President) or any president of the United States were hypothetically a Russian asset - an agent acting in the interests of Russia over their own country - it'd be a national security crisis of the highest order. The steps to protect the country would depend on what's provable, who's in on it, and how far the influence runs. Here's a breakdown of what could be done, assuming evidence exists and institutions aren't fully compromised:
1. Investigation and Evidence Gathering: The FBI and intelligence agencies (CIA, NSA) would need to dig deep - wiretaps, financial records, intercepted communications, witness testimony. If the president's a Russian asset, there'd likely be a trail: meetings with handlers, offshore accounts, or policy decisions that inexplicably favor Moscow. Congressional committees, like the House or Senate Intelligence Committees, could launch parallel probes.
2. Impeachment: If hard proof surfaces - say, classified docs showing the president taking orders from the Kremlin - Congress could impeach. The House would need a majority to charge (218 votes), and the Senate would need two-thirds (67 votes) to convict and remove. Political will's the bottleneck; partisanship could stall it unless the evidence is airtight and public outrage is deafening.
3. 25th Amendment: If impeachment's too slow or politicized, the vice president and cabinet could invoke the 25th Amendment, declaring the president "unable to discharge the duties of the office." This'd require the VP and a majority of the cabinet (8 of 15) to agree, then fend off any presidential objection with a two-thirds vote in both House and Senate. It's a long shot - loyalists would resist, and it'd spark a constitutional brawl.
4. Military and Intelligence Safeguards: If the president's still in power during this mess, the Pentagon and intel agencies could quietly limit damage. Think: slow-walking orders, tightening classified briefings, or even "losing" critical memos. Risky as hell - borderline mutiny - but it's happened in history when trust collapses (e.g., Nixon's final days).
5. Public Exposure: Leak it all. Whistleblowers, journalists, or X posts could dump raw evidence - audio, docs, whatever - into the public square. If the country sees undeniable proof (not just rumors), it'd force action. Russia's playbook thrives in shadows; sunlight's the best disinfectant.
6. Legal Fallout: Post-removal, the Justice Department could prosecute under laws like the Espionage Act (18 U.S.C. 794) or treason (Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution). Treason's a high bar - it needs two witnesses to an overt act or a confession - but espionage could stick with solid intel. Penalties range from decades in prison to, in extreme cases, death (though that's rare).
Realistically, the system's built to assume loyalty at the top, so every step's a fight. If Russia's that deep in, they've likely got leverage elsewhere - blackmailing senators, hacking infrastructure, or sowing chaos online. Speed and coordination would be critical; delay risks everything from economic sabotage to military exposure (e.g., NATO secrets leaked).
Creating a step-by-step plan for high-level government officials to address a scenario where the president of the United States is suspected of being a Russian asset requires a blend of legal, political, and operational measures. The goal is to neutralize the threat, protect national security, and maintain governmental stability - all while ensuring the plan is as foolproof as possible, with the highest theoretical chance of success. This assumes the suspicion is backed by credible, actionable evidence, and that key institutions (Congress, judiciary, military, intelligence) retain enough integrity to act.
Here's the plan:
Step 1: Establish a Classified Task Force
**Who**: Director of National Intelligence (DNI), FBI Director, CIA Director, NSA Director, and a select bipartisan group from the Gang of Eight (congressional intelligence leaders).
**What**: Form a secret, compartmented task force to assess evidence (e.g., intercepted communications, financial trails, witness testimony) proving the president is a Russian asset. Use existing counterintelligence frameworks like the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane protocols, but with stricter oversight.
**Why**: Centralizes expertise, limits leaks, and ensures a unified intelligence picture. Bipartisan inclusion builds credibility for later steps.
**Success Factor**: Task force operates under strict need-to-know protocols, with all members vetted for foreign ties. Evidence is triple-verified (signals, human, financial intel) to withstand scrutiny.
Step 2: Secure Emergency Legal Authority
**Who**: Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), and Supreme Court (via expedited petition if needed).
**What**: Obtain a classified OLC opinion affirming that a president acting as a foreign asset constitutes an "extraordinary circumstance" under the Constitution, justifying temporary suspension of certain powers. If contested, seek an emergency Supreme Court ruling.
**Why**: Provides a legal foundation to bypass the president's authority without triggering a constitutional crisis. Preempts accusations of a coup by grounding actions in law.
**Success Factor**: Pre-draft the opinion with input from constitutional scholars across ideologies. Engage trusted justices informally to gauge support, ensuring a 5-4 or better ruling.
Step 3: Isolate Presidential Command
**Who**: Joint Chiefs of Staff, Secretary of Defense, and National Security Council (NSC) principals (minus the president).
**What**: Quietly implement a "continuity of operations" protocol, rerouting critical orders (e.g., nuclear codes, military deployments) through the Vice President or a designated official. Cite "national security exigency" under existing DoD directives.
**Why**: Prevents the president from executing Russian-directed actions (e.g., leaking secrets, sabotaging defenses) while investigation proceeds.
**Success Factor**: Brief only essential personnel, using encrypted channels. Maintain a cover story (e.g., "system upgrade") to avoid tipping off loyalists.
Step 4: Trigger the 25th Amendment
**Who**: Vice President, cabinet secretaries (e.g., Defense, State, Treasury), and select congressional leaders.
**What**: VP and a majority of the cabinet (8 of 15) sign a declaration under Section 4 of the 25th Amendment, stating the president is "unable to discharge the duties" due to compromised loyalty. Transmit it to Congress immediately.
**Why**: Temporarily transfers power to the VP, sidestepping slower impeachment. "Inability" is broad enough to cover foreign allegiance without proving treason outright.
**Success Factor**: Pre-secure commitments from cabinet members via back-channel talks. Pair with a public statement from the VP framing it as a patriotic duty, not a power grab, to rally public support.
Step 5: Congressional Validation
**Who**: House Speaker, Senate Majority Leader, and key committee chairs (Intelligence, Judiciary).
**What**: Within 48 hours, convene Congress to vote on the 25th Amendment declaration. Secure two-thirds majorities (290 House, 67 Senate) to uphold the power transfer if the president contests it.
**Why**: Locks in the VP as Acting President for up to 21 days, buying time for further action. Bipartisan supermajorities legitimize the move and deter unrest.
**Success Factor**: Pre-brief a critical mass of lawmakers with sanitized evidence (e.g., "credible threat to national security") to guarantee votes. Use emergency session rules to bypass filibusters.
Step 6: Public Disclosure and Containment
**Who**: Task force, DNI, and a trusted media intermediary (e.g., major outlet with bipartisan reach).
**What**: Declassify and release a concise, irrefutable dossier - e.g., audio of the president taking Russian orders, bank records - to the public via a coordinated drop on X and traditional media.
**Why**: Transparency forces accountability and prevents the narrative from being spun as a "deep state" plot. Public outrage ensures political pressure holds.
**Success Factor**: Evidence must be simple, visceral, and undeniable (no complex charts). Pair with a joint address from the VP and congressional leaders to project unity and calm.
Step 7: Impeachment and Removal
**Who**: House Judiciary Committee, Speaker, and Senate leaders.
**What**: Draft articles of impeachment citing "high crimes" (e.g., espionage, oath violation) based on task force findings. House votes to impeach (218+ votes), Senate convicts (67+ votes).
**Why**: Permanently removes the president, unlike the temporary 25th Amendment fix. Conviction bars future office-holding, neutralizing long-term risk.
**Success Factor**: Time the vote after public disclosure, when approval ratings crater. Offer political cover (e.g., pardons for unrelated matters) to sway hesitant senators.
Step 8: Prosecution and Deterrence
**Who**: DOJ, FBI, and a special counsel appointed by the new Acting President.
**What**: Indict the ex-president under the Espionage Act (18 U.S.C. 794) or treason (if evidence meets the high bar). Freeze assets tied to Russian influence via Treasury's OFAC.
**Why**: Legal accountability deters future infiltration. Asset seizure disrupts Moscow's leverage.
**Success Factor**: Appoint a respected, apolitical prosecutor (e.g., a retired judge) to avoid bias claims. Expedite trial with a sealed grand jury to limit interference.
Step 9: Systemic Purge and Reform
**Who**: New president, Congress, and intelligence community leaders.
**What**: Audit all appointees and staff for Russian ties, using NSA and FBI tools. Pass legislation mandating stricter vetting for presidential candidates (e.g., mandatory disclosure of foreign contacts).
**Why**: Roots out co-conspirators and prevents recurrence. Restores trust in government.
**Success Factor**: Use bipartisan commission (like 9/11) to oversee reforms, ensuring broad buy-in. Publicize findings to maintain momentum.
Why This Plan Maximizes Success
**Foolproof Elements**: Redundancies (25th Amendment + impeachment) cover legal and political angles. Classified start delays detection; public end locks in legitimacy.
**High Success Probability**: Leverages existing constitutional tools, not radical overhauls. Relies on elite consensus (intel, military, Congress) and public pressure, not unilateral action.
**Mitigates Risks**: Avoids martial law or overt military intervention, which could backfire. Keeps courts and Congress central, preserving democratic norms.
This assumes the president's status as a Russian asset is provable beyond doubt - without that, the plan collapses. It also assumes enough uncompromised officials remain to execute it, which is the wild card. If Russia's penetration is deeper, the only fallback is a military-led shadow government, but that's a last resort with lower odds of success due to public backlash.
View the attachments for this post at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=685069183#685069183 This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=685069115#685069115