Re: Shouldn't have threatened their sovereignty.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à mni discuss 
Sujet : Re: Shouldn't have threatened their sovereignty.
De : here (at) *nospam* is.invalid (JAB)
Groupes : misc.news.internet.discuss
Date : 24. May 2025, 04:49:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <100rfjf$gut6$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Fri, 23 May 2025 17:13:22 -0400, Auric Hellman
<adhellman1@gmail.com> wrote:

What reason could Canada have for not
wanting protection under a Golden Dome?

I would not think Canada is a target of interest.

"Shashank Joshi, defence editor at the Economist, said while the US
military would take the plan very seriously, it was unrealistic to
think the system would be completed during Trump's term, and that its
cost would take up a large part of the defense budget"

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Dome_(missile_defense_system)>





Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 May 25 * Shouldn't have threatened their sovereignty.4JAB
23 May 25 `* Re: Shouldn't have threatened their sovereignty.3Auric Hellman
24 May 25  +- Re: Shouldn't have threatened their sovereignty.1JAB
24 May 25  `- Re: Shouldn't have threatened their sovereignty.1Eli the Bearded

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal