Sujet : Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it.
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 11. Dec 2024, 19:34:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <7imjljd1v6pn0he0s7hfu2p7uja4uls97l@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Alan <
nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
Apple uses a kernel called XNU that they developed from Mach and
other sources with huge amounts of their own work as well.
>
Now, here's a question for you:
>
Why is it even important which kernel Apple uses?
>
They didn't build it from scratch, like Winblows NT did. Why did
Gates hire Cutler? Why did Apple wish they could've?
>
Why SHOULD they build it from scratch.
>
*That* is the question, believe it or not.
>
One you're not answering...
>
Why do you think we call GNU/Linux mainly "Linux", it's a tribute to
Torvalds for being beyond a genius.
>
That still doesn't answer the question.
I can boot my modern PC with Linux, because a person with the mind to
create a kernel exists. Apple never acquired a programmer quite on
that level, clearly.
>
And again:
>
What does it matter WHO wrote the kernel?
>
What's important is that the computer works.
>
And macOS works.
>
You need to learn what a circular argument is.
It matters that Apple is secondary in the industry. They depend on
Microsoft and Adobe to develop applications. I actually enjoyed
seeing the free trial of M$ Office for Mac. Showed it to my mom,
who's always used Office for Winblows. The Mac version of Office is
actually great software. And I imagine Adobe's stuff is pretty great
on it, and the movie editing, etc. But for a typical PC user, posting
on Usenet everyday, macOS is a quirky choice.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.