Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it.

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

Simple people like simple things [Apple's GUI], I suppose.

>
What's a complex thing that can't be done on a Mac?

>
Nothing.

>
So you have no actual answer.
>
You can't produce a single example of a complex thing that can't be done
on a Mac.
>
Got it.

>
It was acknowledgement of your point.  macOS has every capability that
WinNT and Linux have.

>
So then your insult was just bigotry...
>
...right?

 
I am bigoted against lousiness, yes.

>
1. You haven't shown a single bit of "lousiness" yet. In fact, when
challenged, you have always deflected.
>
2. Your bigotry is in your assumption that anyone who uses a Mac must be
"simple">

The GUI effects of Apple are weird and quirky.  Not as advanced as one
would find with Windows or typical Linux.

What specifically do you not like about the Finder?

>
It's just basic and clunky, or was in ...

>
IN WHAT WAY?
>
What is a specific thing that the Windows and/or Linux file programs do
that the Finder does not do?
>

And how out-of-date is your experience of it; Snow Leopard?

>
Very little since.

>
So your whole claim is bullshit, then.
>
Got it.

 
Finder in Snow Leopard was just Apple being Apple, I guess, not
applying themselves to the product.

IN WHAT SPECIFIC WAY?

It only had rudimentary features.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.