Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it.

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

Macs are good at being Macs.  Linux is superior software, though, and
so is M$.

>
In what way is any Linux software superior.

>
You are astoundingly blind not to see it, you think free == not as
good.  It's not really the truth.  Commercial-OS apps have rarely
mattered to the extent Microsoft would love for you to believe.

>
So you cannot articulate a single thing.
>
Got it.

 
If it were really true, then DFS's here on COLA claim that I run
everything under Wine would be true, and it isn't, I mostly cherish
native Linux GUI apps.

>
You still can't find a single specific way in which Linux software is
superior.
>
Got it.

It's the overall experience.  Linux easily passes the bar.

I could use macOS, Winblows or Linux, and it would make little
difference in my tasks.  But it's certainly most straightforward to
attack that with Linux and its software, along with this Windows app
Forte Agent for Usenet.

>
You think "Forte Agent" is something special do you?
>
What do you do with it that I cannot do with Thunderbird?

 
It's the most comprehensive GUI interface I've seen for Usenet.

>
And you can't run it on Linux...

You can, with Wine.

In what way is the Finder not "feature-rich" when compared to "File
Explorer".
>
Give a specific example.

>
You ever hear of the second mouse button?

>
Yup. But it isn't a feature of the file manager, and the Mac has
supported a second mouse button since 1997.
>
Try again, but get it right for a change.

 
File Explorer has features embedded in right-clicks.

So does the Finder.

"The" Finder.  You talk about it like it's not just some second-rate
crapp by Apple.  Really hilarious.

Contextual menus were introduce to Mac OS in version 8...
>
...in 1997.
>
At just the same time as they added support for a second mouse button.
>
Imagine that!
>
Try again, but maybe check your work before you speak.

My memory of such with Snow Leopard was that it was very basic.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.