Re: No fault cell phone law

Liste des GroupesRevenir à mpm iphone 
Sujet : Re: No fault cell phone law
De : this (at) *nospam* ddress.is.invalid (Frank Slootweg)
Groupes : comp.mobile.android
Date : 21. Mar 2024, 16:34:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NOYB
Message-ID : <uthniu.no8.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
On 2024-03-17 22:12, Andrew wrote:
Stan Brown wrote on Sun, 17 Mar 2024 09:03:20 -0700 :
 
There is no such thing as "an automobile driver with
the right of way."
 
First, anyone who claims cellphones raise the accident rate, is a moron.
(see below for the reason why I say that with confidence)
 
Over here, the law says it is forbidden to use a phone while driving,
without a hands free system. And even with such a system it recommends
to keep the conversation to a minimum, and is justified by causing
accidents.

  In our country (NL) there are similar laws and we *know* that use of
mobile phones causes accidents, including with severe injury and death
(like 4 people in a (other) car), because we keep detailed stats on
circumstances, cause, etc..

  'Andrew' seems to have some problems with statistics, because the
accident rate not going up (BTW, it *does* go up in our country) doesn't
mean that use of mobile phones doesn't cause accidents (to anyone with a
somewhat functioning brain, it's blatantly obvious that it does). *Why*
he can't draw (t)his erronous conclusion, has been explained to him all
the previous times his silly claim came up. Some people learn, others
don't.

You are free to call the lawmakers and the entire police system morons.

  When 'Andrew' starts insulting, everyone knows he has no case, but
can't handle/admit that fact.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
23 Dec 24 o 

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal