Re: The facts show Apple is two generations behind Android in AI (artificial intelligence)

On 7/21/24 1:29 AM, Andrew wrote:

-hh wrote on Sat, 20 Jul 2024 22:10:06 -0400 :
 

Name just one.
                        We'll wait...

>
Non sequitur.
>
Because what is the origin of this claim that Apple can only be successful
in the marketplace if they do nothing less than �leapfrogging�?
>

HINT: These uneducated low-IQ religious zealots just make this stuff up.

>
Which is why I asked you for a substantiating citation of what you�re
trying to use as a goalpost:  due diligence requires that you didn�t try to
disingenuously move said goalposts.

 What's important is that a belief system that is strongly held, and yet,
isn't based on even a single fact - is referred to as purely religious.
 To wit:
a. You clearly hold a very strong belief system about Apple superiority.
b. And yet, your entire belief system is based on exactly zero facts.

On the contrary, the evidence is in the lack of news/drama when it comes to product as deployed - the classical "it just works".

It's classic for Dunning-Kruger people far to the left of Mount Stupid to
claim a strongly held opinion they can't back up with even a single fact.
 Q: Name a single thing that the iPhone does that's better than Android?
A: (we'll wait)

See: "It just works".  The ramifications of this as a developmental discipline is to have V&V of new technologies *prior* to them being sold, to make sure that they're actually work, reliably, in real world fielded applications.  A concrete example of this is *not* adopting a folding display screen that then subsequently fails/degrades in the hands of customers.
And of course, Apple isn't perfectly infallible, for we can cite the 'butterfly' keyboard failures as an illustration of a mistake made: the key thing is to have a corporate culture which minimizes the risks of repeating of prior mistakes - which is indicative of why we've had to refer to a failure in design from 2015 .. nearly a full decade ago.
-hh