Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms

Chris wrote on Wed, 24 Jul 2024 17:23:22 -0000 (UTC) :

Chris. Please put your well-educated adult hat on when you read this.
Warning: There is math involved in sensibly logical thought processes.

 
You present no maths. Just baseless supposition.

Chris,
When you earned that PhD, did you never take any logic classes?

Reporting images isn't the end goal.
The end goal is convictions.

Everyone knows that.

The fact the stories don't report the only metric that matters is a very
clear indication the CSAM process is a complete sham. It's pure bullshit.
 

1. There is NOTHING in the news articles about conviction rates.
2. Let's say that another way: The articles are complete bullshit!
 
The articles are yellow journalism clickbait, Chris.
 
Without specifying conviction rates, the number of reported images is
completely meaningless, Chris.
 
In fact, it could be Apple's conviction rate is far greater than that oF
Google & Facebook for all we know, Chris.
 
Since the conviction rate isn't stated, I will assume it is zero.
Think about that.

 
You're only making that assumption because it suits your preference and
bias.

The only metric that matters is the conviction rate.
Not the number of images reported.

Did you ever take logic in college, Chris?

There might have been thousands of arrests and convictions. Or will be in
the future as the investigations can take a while.

Have you ever seen Ukraine videos where the Kadarovs are firing thousands
of bullets in those TikTok videos? Nobody was hit. It's all pure bullshit.

Same here.

The fact they didn't report convictions means the whole CSAM story is
bullshit, Chris. It's pure bullshit that has no reason to exist.

Everyone is hurt.
Nobody is protected.

For absolutely zero gain in child safety, all our privacy was compromised.

 
Simply a convenience for you to think like that.

For you to claim that the only thing that matters is the number of images
reported and not in the number of convictions, is not surprising, Chris.

Maybe you should take a class in logic.